A video game characters résumé stacked with relevant usable keywords

A video game characters rà ©sumà © stacked with relevant usable keywords The beginningsHave you ever played the game Getting Over It? It’s a terrible, terrible game created by Bennett Foddy where you play as a man sitting in a cauldron, and the entire purpose is to climb up a very large hill with a hammer. Sounds simple in theory, but in the words of the creator, this game is made to hurt people. And it does that well.We used to play this game on our breaks. I say used to, because after falling off the cliff so many times and having to start over, Michael (the owner of the company) uninstalled it from Steam in a fit of climbing rage (or moment of clarity, depending on how you want to see it). And all was well in the land of Full Stack Talent.A few days after The Great Uninstallationâ„ ¢, we were all working quietly at our desks and Michael turned to us and said â€Å"Wouldn’t it be funny if we made a rà ©sumà © for a climber, but like, we put a bunch of developer keywords in there and see if any recruiters reach out to us?†And th us, Django Ovrette was born.We created a doc file on our shared Google drive and off we went writing a rà ©sumà © for a professional climber, stacking it with as many dev keywords as we could. My personal favorite is â€Å"pretty huge python, or php, as I like to call him.† We spent a couple of hours perfecting the rà ©sume (stopping to cry-laugh a few times), creating a google voice number and a new email address, and when we were done, off Django went to the internet! We then searched for a few of the keywords (like php, yii, django, etc) and there he was in all his glory.Django, in all his glory. Can you catch all the references? Hint: there are a LOT.  hbspt.cta.load(2785852, '9e52c197-5b5b-45e6-af34-d56403f973c5', {});We went back to work, and waited for the calls and emails to roll in – and it didn’t take long. We posted the rà ©sumà © on January 26th (a Friday, for reference) in the afternoon and had emails when we came in on Monday morning.Being t hat I’m a huge data nerd, I took the liberty of compiling some information on the recruiters who reached out to Django.As of January 26th (keep in mind, this is less than a month), Django has received:110 emails50% (roughly) were form letters – these came mostly from big recruiting agencies50% (roughly) were personalized for Django15 phone calls8 voicemailsOf these communiquà ©s, 2 voicemails stood out. One was a recruiter from a small, local firm stating that she wasn’t sure what Django’s role at Dick’s was, but she wanted to speak to him about his experience, because â€Å"clearly you have some dev knowledge, but I can’t tell if this is a joke or not.† She ended up calling Django twice and emailing once.The second voicemail came from a senior recruiter at a mid-sized recruiting company, and it started with her laughing and saying this was the best thing she had seen in 17 years as a recruiter. She continued by saying she printed it out and passed it around the office, and asked for a call back because she wanted to know who was â€Å"really behind this.† We saved that voicemail.Our takeawayWhat we learned from Django’s foray into job searching is that, unfortunately, most big recruiting firms frankly don’t seem to actually spend any time on you. Form letters, keyword searching rather than actually reading your rà ©sumà ©, emails only with no call follow up, etc. Django saw much better communication with the folks who came from small recruiting agencies – they reached out with personalized emails and followed up with calls. Being that we are a small recruiting agency ourselves, we really appreciated seeing the parallels, and it reinforced that we’re doing it right by going for quality over quantity.Words of adviceBig guys, don’t forget your candidates are people. Spend the time to actually read their rà ©sumà ©s and see if the qualifications actually match instead of running their CV through a keyword search. We know your time is limited (trust us, we do) but so is the candidate’s – and they deserve to have someone who is dedicated to finding them the best career match possible.Small guys, keep it up. Your personal touch and solid, constant communication and follow-ups are immensely appreciated, and probably make the difference on whether a candidate/client will want to work with you or not.- About the authorThis article was written by Roxanne Williams, who works at Full Stack Talent, a technology recruiting agency in Tampa, FL.

Free Essays on Clausewitz Strategy Tactics

as dealing with the big picture in a military campaign, including the overall plan for winning a war as a whole and at a large-scale level. In his magnum opus of military policy, the noted Prussian author, Karl von Clausewitz, described strategy, which he viewed as more of an art, as the planning of a whole campaign and conversely described tactics, which was viewed as being generally more scientific in character, as the planning of a single battle. Clausewitz asserts these general beliefs when he makes the statement â€Å"Tactics is the art of using soldiers in battle; strategy is the art of using battles to win a war.† In Clausewitz's theory, all military strategy is part of the larger political pattern, yet his definition of strategy emphasizes battle, which implies the assumption that Clausewitz’s characterization of strategy makes it’s basis in the proper execution of tactics, and, logically, subsequent tactical maneuvers. Clausewitz states that war is an effort that requires infinite patience and strength, but is usually decided in a major battle. As he states quite clearly, time after time, "there is only one means in war: combat." The subtlety that one must be aware of here is that by "combat" Clausewitz means not only the actual bloody clash of armed men on the field of battle but also the potential for clashes. The distinction is crucial. He... Free Essays on Clausewitz Strategy Tactics Free Essays on Clausewitz Strategy Tactics Strategy has been defined in the dictionary as the military science, or art, of marshaling a nation’s military, political and economic capabilities to bring about a desired military result, whereas tactics can be defined as being the military science of obtaining objectives through the deployment and maneuvering of soldiers, ships and planes, etc. Straightforwardly, in tactics the means are the fighting forces and are generally described as dealing with the smaller picture and the most immediate plans for winning a battle; while strategy instead can be described in other words as dealing with the big picture in a military campaign, including the overall plan for winning a war as a whole and at a large-scale level. In his magnum opus of military policy, the noted Prussian author, Karl von Clausewitz, described strategy, which he viewed as more of an art, as the planning of a whole campaign and conversely described tactics, which was viewed as being generally more scientific i n character, as the planning of a single battle. Clausewitz asserts these general beliefs when he makes the statement â€Å"Tactics is the art of using soldiers in battle; strategy is the art of using battles to win a war.† In Clausewitz's theory, all military strategy is part of the larger political pattern, yet his definition of strategy emphasizes battle, which implies the assumption that Clausewitz’s characterization of strategy makes it’s basis in the proper execution of tactics, and, logically, subsequent tactical maneuvers. Clausewitz states that war is an effort that requires infinite patience and strength, but is usually decided in a major battle. As he states quite clearly, time after time, "there is only one means in war: combat." The subtlety that one must be aware of here is that by "combat" Clausewitz means not only the actual bloody clash of armed men on the field of battle but also the potential for clashes. The distinction is crucial. He...

Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 18

Research Paper Example Indeed, it was ultimately an expression of America’s character during that era. 2. The American lifestyles: Though it is a little bit hard to take this point as a form of serious criticism, most American lifestyles and way of life was so fascinating. This depicted America as being a violent country. That most Americans often feed on a constant diet of bloody television programs, movies, as well as murder mysteries (Henry, 19).These have often translated into the practical senses of Road rage, beatings, highway killings, and even murder of those who seem different. This facts and events can be drawn from accident reports, newspapers, labor statistics, and even from the local histories. 3. The entire American Revolution: This was the ultimate revolution that led to the creation of US. It started as the colonies’ political upheaval against the British Empire, and profoundly turned out towards influencing the nineteenth century Europe through demands for immediate radical social and political changes (Henry,